How We Chose Who Belongs in the Ark

Every story in this blog began with a question: what makes an animal worth remembering?
Not as a mascot, not as a metaphor, but as a participant — a being who stepped into the human world of work, war, or wonder and left a mark that stayed.

To answer that, we built a method. Each subject was examined not by affection or folklore, but by record. We used military logs, lab notes, witness statements, newspaper accounts, even scraps of film or photographs. Each was scored across seven quiet measures: sacrifice, agency, impact, dependence, symbolic weight, longevity, and, when needed, complicity — the measure of how much of their “choice” was really ours.

It was never mathematics so much as a moral geometry. Points helped us see patterns: who risked everything, who was used, who kept showing up, and who left behind something larger than themselves. The scale wasn’t there to judge them, but to remind us that heroism and harm often share the same leash.

From those patterns emerged four kinds of remembrance.
Legends, Champion, Saints, and the Honorables.

The borders between them blur. Some animals carry pieces of all four. What matters is not category, but continuity — a shared thread of loyalty, courage, or endurance strong enough to cross species.

Together they form a ledger of service and sacrifice: the Ark of Heroes and Martyrs.

A census of every creature who ever shouldered a human burden and, for one brief moment, became unforgettable. They need to be remembered by name.

.